Hardware Requirements
Overview
A locally mounted SSD (Solid-State Drive) or NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express) disk is essential for optimal performance. Avoid Hard Disk Drives (HDD), as they can cause Erigon to lag behind the blockchain tip, albeit not fall behind.
| Component | Recommendation | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Disk Type | Use high-end NVMe SSDs. | Avoid HDDs. SSD performance may degrade when nearing full capacity. |
| Disk Configuration | A single NVMe device is enough for any pruning mode. | An archive node fits on one 4 TB drive, so RAID 0 striping is not needed. For failure protection, use a mirrored array, not RAID 0. See Filesystem. |
| Filesystem | ext4 or XFS | See Filesystem below. |
| RAM | Adequate memory is crucial | Reduces bottlenecks during sync and improves performance under load. |
| CPU | 4–8 cores for Full nodes, 8–16 cores for Archive nodes | More cores are generally better for intense sync and query operations. |
| Linux | Kernel version > v4 | A modern Linux distribution is required. |
Filesystem
Use ext4 or XFS on a single NVMe device. The disk figures below are measured on ext4, and that is the configuration Erigon's own measurements come from. XFS is a reasonable choice on the same reasoning, but we have not measured it.
Mount with noatime so reads do not generate metadata writes:
UUID=xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx /data ext4 defaults,noatime 0 2
Use the filesystem UUID (blkid prints it) rather than a /dev/nvme… name, which can move between boots. The final 2 is the fsck pass for a non-root filesystem.
Why the filesystem matters
Erigon's bottleneck is disk latency, not throughput or IOPS — see Improving Performance. Erigon does pre-warm what it can, but two properties of the workload mean its reads cannot be fully predicted, so part of every block's reads lands cold:
- EVM execution reads arbitrary state. Nothing tells you in advance which accounts or storage slots a block will touch. Once the working set no longer fits in RAM, some of those reads land on cold data no cache had reason to hold.
- Merkle trie updates pull in neighbours. Updating one key requires reading the nodes next to it in the trie. Those may be accounts the EVM never touches — they are involved only because of where they sit in the trie.
Every layer the filesystem adds is added on top of each of those reads. That is what favours a thin filesystem here: ext4 and XFS store a file and leave caching to the OS page cache, which is what Erigon's memory-mapped database is built to use.
Filesystems to avoid
Prefer a plain journaling filesystem over a copy-on-write or database-like one:
- ZFS behaves more like a database than a filesystem. It keeps its own write-ahead log and its own cache (ARC), and that cache competes with the OS page cache for the same RAM. Optional features such as encryption and dedup add work to the read path this workload is bound by, and tuning ZFS for it is not a solved problem.
- Btrfs is a copy-on-write B-tree of pages, and Erigon's MDBX database is itself a B-tree of pages, so you end up running a database inside a database. Its
autodefragfeature is the sharpest edge: it can multiply write I/O by as much as 100x. See Background File System Features Can Hurt Performance.
Filesystems other than ext4 and XFS are not part of what we measure, so treat their performance as unverified rather than assumed.
A few more points that follow from Erigon's storage model — see Database for the layout:
- One device is enough. An archive node fits on a single 4 TB drive, so RAID 0 gains you no capacity you need while doubling the chance of losing the datadir. Stripe only if no single drive you have is large enough.
- For failure protection, use redundancy — not RAID 0. A mirrored array and ECC memory guard against a failing disk or bad RAM, which is what Best Practices recommends. RAID 0 does the opposite.
- Most of the datadir is re-downloadable. Snapshot files are content-addressed and refetched from peers, so
chaindata/is the part worth backing up. - Erigon memory-maps its database. Leave RAM free for the page cache rather than handing it to a filesystem or volume manager to cache on its own.
- Network and cloud block storage are slow for block execution. See known issues.
If you must split the datadir across a fast and a slow device, see Optimizing Storage.
Disk Size and RAM Requirements
The amount of disk space recommended and RAM you need depends on the pruning mode you want to run. Current Disk Usage values listed below are obtained using the standard Erigon + Caplin configuration, varying only the --prune.mode flag unless a tab notes otherwise.
- Ethereum mainnet
- Gnosis Chain
- Sepolia
- Hoodi
- Chiado
| Pruning Mode | Current Disk Usage | Disk Size (Recommended) | RAM (Required) | RAM (Recommended) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Archive | 2.03 TB | 4 TB | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Full (Default) | 419.04 GB | 2 TB | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Minimal | 378.97 GB | 1 TB | 16 GB | 64 GB |
Current Disk Usage measured as of 2026-07-19; usage grows over time as the chain grows.
| Pruning Mode | Current Disk Usage | Disk Size (Recommended) | RAM (Required) | RAM (Recommended) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Archive | 673.59 GB | 1 TB | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Full (Default) | 220.10 GB | 1 TB | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Minimal | 204.45 GB | 500 GB | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Current Disk Usage measured as of 2026-07-21; usage grows over time as the chain grows.
| Pruning Mode | Current Disk Usage |
|---|---|
| Archive | 1.04 TB |
| Full (Default) | 238.71 GB |
| Minimal | 218.06 GB |
Current Disk Usage measured as of 2026-08-05; usage grows over time as the chain grows. Measured on v3.5.4; the Archive figure was taken a day later, on 2026-08-06.
| Pruning Mode | Current Disk Usage |
|---|---|
| Archive | 115.85 GB |
| Full (Default) | 48.36 GB |
| Minimal | 45.61 GB |
Current Disk Usage measured as of 2026-08-04; usage grows over time as the chain grows. Measured on v3.5.4.
| Pruning Mode | Current Disk Usage |
|---|---|
| Archive | 26.95 GB |
| Full (Default) | 13.32 GB |
| Minimal | 13.16 GB |
Current Disk Usage measured as of 2026-08-07; usage grows over time as the chain grows. Measured on v3.5.4. Minimal and Full are near-identical on Chiado: the chain is young enough that pruning has little history to remove.
See also how you can optimize storage.
Bandwidth Requirements
Your internet bandwidth is also an important factor, particularly for sync speed and validator performance.
| Node Type | Bandwidth (Required) | Bandwidth (Recommended) |
|---|---|---|
| Staking/Mining | 10 Mbps | 50 Mbps |
| Non-Staking | 5 Mbps | 25 Mbps |
Sync Times
Approximate times to sync from scratch to the tip of the chain.
| Chain | Archive | Full (Default) | Minimal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethereum | ~8 h | ~4–6 h | ~2 h |
| Gnosis | ~2 h | ~1–2 h | ~30 m |
These figures are indicative and are not measured by CI — read them as an order of magnitude, not a target. Most of the elapsed time is snapshot download rather than block execution, so your available bandwidth influences the result more than CPU does: expect proportionally faster syncs on a well-connected host and slower ones on a constrained link.